Update on Data Science Course

After a second month, I have completed a total of 2 sections of the 9 section Data Science Specialization Course, (Massive Online Open Course, or MOOC), from Johns Hopkins University / Coursera.org.

The completed course sections are: “The Data Scientist’s Toolbox”, score: 98%,

Coursera Johns Hopkins University Data Sci Toolbox 98 percent with Distinction 2014

and “R Programming”, score: 100%.

Coursera Johns Hopkins University R Programming 100 percent with Distinction 2014

Looking forward to exploring the world of online, large dataset Data Analysis, and including “Data Science” in my list of skills!

Learning Data Science from Johns Hopkins University online

I earned 98.0% (with Distinction) in The Data Scientist’s Toolbox Course from Johns Hopkins University.


Data Scientist's Toolbox Certificate

This was my first Massive Online Open Course. I found the course at coursera.org, and discovered the course was created as a Johns Hopkins University online course. Because this was my first MOOC, I had no idea what the structure of the course was. The website navigation had several possible interpretations, so the first week was spent learning exactly what was needed to access the entire learning environment. I scored a 90% on the first week’s quiz, as a result.

The next three weeks of the Data Science online course didn’t involve learning a new online interface, and therefore I scored 100% on all the next 3 quizzes, and in all 4 parts of the end-of-month course project.

Thanks to everyone that supported me, by liking my test result postings on Facebook, during the one month process.

Eight more one month courses are required to gain the entire Data Science Specialization Certification from JHU. I am definitely looking forward to the journey!

Configuring a Google+ private Community as a ESN

In order to implement an ESN for my new company, ContextBase, I decided to configure a Google+ private Community as a Enterprise Social Network. An important part of this concept is the use of discussion topics configured as Company departments.

After the Community has been created as a private Community, (that cannot be set to Public), the company logo has been imported, the About section created, and the company members set-up, the ESN can be integrated as a Social Layer over the Company’s productivity programs.

The company members’ Google Drive accounts are configurable for data storage and productivity programs with sharing via the Google+ Community ESN, and Gmail with ESN sharing is a method for client database/correspondence functionality.

My methodology for working with a Google+ Community ESN is:

First, sign into the Company Member Google Account, then navigate to the Google+ Community ESN, (ContextBase), then open Gmail/Tasks, Calendar, Drive, & Google+ in separate tabs.

In order for business processes to not mire in information technology confusion, I recommend that all company communications take place through the Google+ ESN Community, all completed work is posted to a department discussion thread subgroup, Person to Person communications take place through the Google Chat dialog box at bottom right of the Community and Google+ screens, and Video conferencing takes place via Google+ Hangouts at the Google+ tab.

These photographs show the Moblie version of the ContextBase Google+ Community ESN:

1) The first photo shows an accounting file, (that had been posted to the Accounting thread), opened successfully in an Android mobile browser.


2) The second photo shows the mobile ESN with the Accounting thread selected.


Possibilities of Activity Stream Computing

This is my assessment of the possibilities of Enterprise/Consumer Social Networks as a Top Layer application, and an Activity Stream Computing environment. In the future, persons will sit down to work, and whether telecommuting or working from a specifically business-oriented location, start up their Activity Stream Computers. The Basic Layer of this Activity Stream Computer, the same as the Operating System, will be an Activity Stream Programming environment, (possibly similar to the website http://www.ifttt.com).

Starting with the Basic Layer Activity Stream Operating System, the Activity Stream Computer will launch applications based on Social Networking only. These applications will be the equivalent of present Social Networks – Google+, Yammer, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, etc. Enterprise Social Networks, like Yammer, will have become the same as personal Consumer Social Networks. In other words, in order to work, persons will operate the same Social Networking-based application as persons operate in order to shop, interact with government, plan their lives, socialize with friends, and read/listen/watch entertainment media.

In order to socialize, shop, conduct personal business, and for entertainment, persons will use multi-function Consumer Social Networking with the same capabilities found with Enterprise Social Networking. There will be no difference between a Consumer Social Network and a Enterprise Social Network. Both will be multi-functional, and contain within them the multiple computing applications required by persons to work, or live their personal lives.

With this form of Activity Stream Computing, employees using Personal Social Networks at Work will eventually not be considered in any way unusual. Employees will work and take care of their personal interactions concurrently. The personal Social Networking of Employees will appear in the Activity Streams of the same Enterprise Social Network they use for Work. The work they need to perform to earn an income will appear in the Activity Streams of the Consumer Social Network they use at home, for personal business.

When a Consumer, via Social Networking, is purchasing services from a Business, (via Social Networking), the Employees of that Business will see the relevant Consumer, and all the other Individuals interacting with that Business within a Social Network context. The Consumer will also see all the other Consumers interacting with the same Business they are mutually purchasing services from via the Activity Streams of the Consumer/Enterprise Social Network application.

It is possible that Twitter will become only a back end for Twitter-like dialog box Applications within Multi-System Social Networks. LinkedIn could become only a back end for employment networking within a Top Layer Social Network.

Therefore the Layers would be – ifttt.com Activity Stream Programming base layer, a Multi-Activity Stream Layer Social Network Appllication, multiple Single Activity Stream Social Networks providing integrated multiple Activity Streams for the previous Layer, Productivity Applications that operate within the Multi-Activity Stream Social Network, with the Files produced existing in a Social context from intial creation of the Files. Legacy concepts of Productivity Applications will eventually phase out, as persons and businesses switch to Productivity with Social Networking dialogs, including the legacy applications, spreadsheets and slide presentations.

Options for Sustainable Solar and Wind Power Generation

Although maligned for decades, and sabotaged by Oil Companies, (such as Atlantic Richfield Company – Arco), Solar Power and Wind Power, have made advances since the turn of the century, and are now optimally positioned to generate a large percentage or even major percentage of the Electricity requirements of the World.

The Benefits of Sustainable Power Generation are the ability to generate power without Blackouts caused by Storms, Hurricanes, Blizzards, Power Plant accidents, and Power Line/Transformer Station accidents. Solar/Wind Power is also immune from Blackouts caused by Warfare, and therefore more secure than centralized non-sustainable power generation. An already familiar benefit of Solar/Wind Power is Power Generation without use of non-sustainable and polluting resources, (i.e. Oil/Coal/Uranium).

I put together this blog on Solar/Wind Power mainly to create text in order to practice creating a Presentation with the online program, SlideRocket, and also in order to delineate my concepts of efficient Solar/Wind Power generation and Electricity Storage, utilizing CoGeneration.

Therefore, I advocate that entities that are interested in the end of non-sustainability regarding electricity generation, pursue the following CoGeneration options for Solar/Wind Power -

1) CoGeneration without Battery Storage. Instead of Battery Storage, the Solar/Wind power generation, and electricity use, by individual CoGenerators is digitally monitored. Extra generated electricity can be sent via a CoGeneration grid to cogenerators that are temporarily undergenerating electricity, possibly because of lack of sunlight or wind.

2) CoGeneration with Community Battery Storage. Individual CoGenerators would generate Solar or Wind Power without individual Battery Storage, the same as option 1. However, local community scale Battery Storage Facilities would allow CoGenerators to have locally available Stored Electricity, in case of temporary undergeneration of electricity. Also, the local Battery Storage could send electricity anywhere in the CoGeneration grid.

3) Cogeneration with Power Plant Scale Battery Storage. This option would involve Local Solar/Wind Power Generation with the availability of Large Scale Battery Storage Facilities that have replaced Power Plants, and are instead used for Electricity Storage. The objective of this option is the storing of large amounts of extra electricity, with the option of sending via the cogeneration grid extra electricity to CoGeneration customers temporarily undergenerating electricity.

The Boston Forms Party

Paper Forms are ubiquitous in the Corporate World. The volume of paper forms in storage is reaching a critical mass at the beginning of the 21st Century. Throughout the corporate world, paper forms are deteriorating in File Cabinets and In/Out Boxes. The more paper forms in storage, the more time is required for customer service that is dependent on retrieving paper forms. This state of inefficiency requires a streamlining of business processes. Because of only one stage of business processing, (the need to extract information from typed text and handwritten paper forms), the processes of businesses remain unnecessarily slow and plodding.
A recent AIIM study, “Forms Processing – User Experiences of Text and Handwriting Recognition”, has found that businesses could have a 54% improvement in processes if the incredible volumes and varieties of Paper Forms in storage were digitally accessible. This would require OCR, (Optical Character Recognition), and ICR, (Intelligent Character Recognition). Because of advances in graphical parallel processing in the last 5 years, it is now possible to efficiently convert paper forms in storage to digital information. The volume of Paper Forms has reached an intolerable state. What is preventing the conversion of these forms to digitized information is the non-recognition of the advances in OCR and ICR during the last 5 years.
What is needed is a Boston Forms Party lead by a new Sons of Liberty – Information Managers, Information Specialists, and other Information Professionals. The same as when the original Sons of Liberty left the meeting lead by Samuel Adams in 1773 to dump unwanted tea into Boston Harbor, (in order to reject Taxation without Representation in the form of taxed tea that the unrepresented Bostonians had to accept), Information Professionals need to leave their departments to convince decision makers to rid Small, Medium, and Large Enterprises of the taxing burden of Paper Forms that haven’t been digitally archived, or including in digital Business Processes.
Information Professionals need to inform decision makers of the new capabilities of OCR/ICR to extract information even from complex forms layouts and handwritten fields. Then, with Paper Forms having been turned into Electronic Records, businesses need to move to the next step – including OCR/ICR scanned data into their business processes. With the recognition of handwriting not presenting any problem to modern data capture techniques, the time is now to reject the potentially disastrous landfill of inaccessible Paper Forms being stored by businesses.
In order to defeat Paper Forms, a Boston Forms Party would require the bridging of disconnected decision-making, and the consolidating of scanning/data capture across multiple departments, possibly via the implementation of digital mailrooms. In the same way the Boston Tea Party in 1773 was the beginning of the Revolution against England’s control over the unrepresented American Colonies, a Boston Forms Party would end control by increasingly inefficient Paper Forms over a Corporate World denied the benefits of the volume, variety, and velocity of information processing that has become available in recent years.
The Boston Forms Party Revolution should resonate throughout Lines of Business within companies, and possibly even reach Outsourcing Services that haven’t upgraded to OCR/ICR, in order to free Business Processes of oppressive Paper Forms.